The House of Frankenstein -review by Lawrence S. Talbot

Screen Shot 2014-02-21 at 10.58.56 PM 3 stabs

I love this silly movie. While this was made during a low point in the Universal monster series and is often seen as an extremely watered down, tired version of the classic horror characters, I’ve always been fond of it. It’s very wacky and not even the least bit scary, even by 1940’s standards, but it’s a lot of fun. It expands upon the “Monster rally” formula that was set up with the previous film, Frankenstein meets the wolf man (1943) and becomes the one that really seems to have it all, for better or worse. Universal’s three most famous monsters-Dracula, Wolf man, Frankenstein monster, return in this one. They are joined by original Frankenstein monster actor, Boris Karloff as a mad scientist, A hunchback played by J Carrol Naish, and even a gorgeous Gypsy girl played by Helena Verdugo.

house of frankenstein

The film plays as something of a series of misadventures, with the scientist, Dr Nieman (Karloff) and his Hunchback friend, Daniel (Naish) escaping from prison and hijacking a traveling chamber of horrors. They revive the three monsters along the way, in order to get revenge on the Judges that put them in prison.

John Carradine plays Count Dracula very well and with his top hat and Pencil thin mustache, he more closely resembles the Dracula in the Stoker novel than had been attempted before. He’s charming and Suave and while he never quite captures the creepiness of Lugosi;s take on the character, he’s still quite splendid. Sadly, Dracula is quickly dispatched by the first half of the film, before he even has the chance to interact with the other two monsters.

Screen Shot 2014-02-21 at 10.59.23 PM

Glen Strange is serviceable as the more hulking and monstrous Frankenstein creature. While he doesn’t have the pathos of Karloff’s monster (as a result of the brain surgery performed on him 2 movies back), it’s neat to see Karloff literally standing face to face with the role that he made famous. It’s a funny commentary on Karloff’s career and of the role that he would never completely escape from. While you can’t deny the classic beauty of the original Frankenstein monster makeup, Strange had a broader face and is really cool looking in as the creature in his own right.

Screen Shot 2014-02-21 at 10.59.36 PM
Chaney continues his tried and true shtick as the tormented Larry Talbot but unfortunately spends little screen time as his lycanthropic counterpart. The addition of a gypsy girl is nice because it not only recalls Esmeralda in The Hunchback of Note Dame, with Daniel acting as a lovestruck Quasimodo type, but also references the previous Wolf man movies. The film recalls a lot of the wolf man lore from before, while adding new ones. For instance, this is the first film that mentions that a werewolf can only be killed with a silver bullet fired by someone who loves him. While the moon had been shown in the previous film, this is also the movie that really cements the idea of Werewolves changing as a result of it. The classic wolf man poem is even quoted once again and is further expanded upon.

Screen Shot 2014-02-21 at 10.59.49 PM

This movie attempts to juggle its monsters around in order the make everyone happy and for the most part, it manages to work. The first half is Dracula’s movie, while the second belongs to the Wolf man, with the mad doctor and hunchback being the glue that holds it all together. Despite the title, The Frankenstein monster doesn’t get much to do here. In the film’s defense, the character had already had four movies to himself and one costarring role with the Wolf man, and having been virtually watered down to the role of mindless brute at this point, his destructive revival at the climax is satisfying enough.

Screen Shot 2014-02-21 at 11.00.02 PM

While the classic monster movies had been reduced to clichéd kiddy fare at this point in the series, this really is the sum of its parts. The combination of Karloff, Carradine, Chaney, all of the monster characters, the gypsy girl, appearances by Universal favorites, Lional Atwill and George Zucco- all peppered with a beautiful score by genre veteran, Hans J. Salter, it really is the ultimate Monster Rally. Abbott and Costello meet Frankenstein may be a better movie all around, but This is the one that really has it all.

-Lawrence S. Talbot

Lawrence Tolbert ron nelson

Horror Express -review Lawrence S. Talbot

horror express4 stabs

This is one that’s really slipped through the cracks over the years and there isn’t much of an excuse for it, because it’s in the public domain and readily available for free on the internet or on a variety of cheap, public domain collections that you can find in any number of Wal-Mart bargain bins. However, it’s also for that reason that it’s a real diamond in the rough.

Christopher Lee plays Archaeologist, Professor Alexander Saxton, who discovered a prehistoric ape-man , which may be the famous missing link, frozen in ice. Proud of his discovery, Saxton puts his precious cargo onto a train and plans are made for the exhibition of the groundbreaking discovery. Aboard the train, Saxton meets his professional rival, Doctor Wells, played by the great, Peter Cushing. The frozen creature soon revives and begins killing people aboard the train. When the monster is shot dead, everyone believes the nightmare to be over. However, the victims of the creature soon display eerie blood red eyes and turn homicidal. Saxton and Wells must combine forces in order to get to the root of the creature’s origins and stop the killings.

christopher lee

The film is a take on the the classic Agatha Christie novel, Murder on the Orient Express and replaces the traditional killer with a creature of possible demonic origins. The always wonderful Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee star in this underrated monster movie and give the already spooky offerings a sense of class. The creature’s origins are really interesting and surprisingly seem to draw from John W Campbell’ story, Who Goes there?, which was also the basis for the 1951 science fiction classic, the Thing from another world and its John Carpenter remake from 1982.

horror express

The real horror comes from the fact that the characters are isolated on a train, while the creature could really be anyone onboard. The creepy, whistling musical score by John Cacavas is very chilling and you will probably find yourself whistling it after watching the film. Though it’s a Spanish production, it feels like it belongs right alongside one of the British Hammer or Amicus classics that were being produced at around the same time. I really whole heartedy recommend it and since it’s so readily available, what do you have to lose?

horror express

-Lawrence S. Talbot

Lawrence Tolbert ron nelson

Dracula: A Retrospective by Lawrence S. Talbot

dracula white 4 stabs

As I begin writing this, it’s Valentine’s day. Not only is this a day for love or consuming mass amounts of candy that will inevitably make you sick the next day, it also marks the 83rd anniversary of the release of Dracula, the immortal classic starring Bela Lugosi. This landmark film ushered in the Golden age of Horror films and is a cherished classic to this day; one that should be a quintessential part of every horror fan’s collection. Time may not have been as kind to Dracula as it has been to Frankenstein. It’s flawed, even for its time, but its an iconic film that contains some of horror cinemas greatest moments and sparked the career of the great Bela Lugosi.

Starting in 1921 with the Hungarian film, Dracula’s Death, the Bram Stoker novel had been adapted for the screen several times. The most famous being F.W Murnau’s Nosferatu in 1922. Most versions took extreme liberties with the source, with Murnau’s film surprisingly remaining the most loyal to it. However, all prints of these films were burned after Stoker’s widow sued for copyright infringement and only Nosferatu remains ( A tragedy and a true lesson on the importance of film preservation). After negotiations with Florence Stoker, Dracula was adapted as a play by Irish playwright and actor, Hamilton Deane. It was this version that would become the template for most of the Dracula adaptations to come. The play would eventually be moved to Broadway in 1927, where it received an over-hall, being re-casted and rewritten by John L. Balderston, who would go on to pen the 31′ film, along with many of Universal’s important monster movies of the 30’s. It was in this version of the play that the role of Dracula was given to the man who would become most associated with the character, Bela Lugosi.

dracula

Béla Ferenc Dezső Blaskó was born on October 20th, 1882 in Lugos, Hungary. He later changed his name to Lugosi in honor of his birthplace. The youngest of four children, Lugosi dropped out of school and began acting at the age of 12. He served as an infantryman, eventually rising to Captain in the Austro- Hungarian Army during World War I. He would obtain a Wound Medal after receiving an injury that would have serious repercussions later in his life, including a dependency on pain killers that would  nearly destroy him. As part of the actor’s union during the Hungarian Revolution, Lugosi was forced to flee the country in 1919. He would continue acting in Berlin before eventually settling in the united states. Lugosi formed a stock company with fellow Hungarian actors and in 1922 would act in his first Broadway play, The Red Poppy. In 1927, he finally landed the role of Count Dracula in the revised version of Deane’s play and would portray the Count 261 times on the stage.

dracula

Universal founder, Carl Laemmle Sr. wasn’t fond of horror films and all of the ones produced during the silent era were very carefully chosen, always leaving out supernatural elements, instead settling on human monsters as the antagonists. Gothic horror and the supernatural were strictly a staple of European films. However, once Laemmle’s son began producing films at Universal, things began to change. Producer Carl Laemmle Jr. conceived of a Dracula adaptation as a big, lavish production in the vein of The Hunchback of Notre Dame, which would star Universal’s reigning horror star, Lon Chaney. Sadly, this was not to be, as Chaney passed away following a battle with throat cancer and the great depression caused studios to scale back considerably. Due to budget constants, the decision was made to base the film on the more limited Hamilton Deane play rather than slaving to the Stoker novel.

dracula

When Chaney was still attached to the film, the role of director was given to Tod Browning, who had previously collaborated with the man of a thousand faces on several Silent classics, including West of Zanzibar, The Unholy three, the unknown, and the lost vampire film, London after Midnight. Both Edward Van Sloan and eventually, Bela Lugosi were pulled in from the stage play to star as Van Helsing and the Count. Browning was reluctant to replace his friend, Chaney with Lugosi and spent much of the filming in a rather aloof state.  While Dracula would have the distinction of being the first Horror film with sound, coming off of the silent era under the direction of a less involved director would make for a slightly troubled production and occasionally inept final product. German cinematographer, Karl Freund, frequent collaborator with famed director Fritz Lang on such films as Metropolis (1927) was rumored to have actually directed much of the film, with Browning being very low key on the set. The acting and stage direction owes more to the silent era and being based on the play, many of the special effects sequences are conveniently off camera. Dracula simply doesn’t fully take advantage of its cinematic possibilities.

review dracula

Admittedly, there is a certain ineptness to Dracula, but while it’s flawed, there are some marvelous and spooky sequences as well.. Bela Lugosi brings so much to the role and perfectly captures the essence of the Count. Being from Hungary and not quite mastering the English language, Lugosi gives the character an authentic foreign and alien quality, making Dracula the strange outsider that he should be, while also giving him the  charm and enigmatic quality that is most appropriate for the character. Another highlight is Dwight Frye as the lunatic Renfield, who steals every scene that he is in with his manic nature and unforgettable laugh. Rounding out the cast is Edward Van Sloan as Professor Abraham Van Helsing, who gives authority and grounding to the film’s supernatural qualities and creates a balance between the otherworldly Dracula and maniacal and tragic Renfield, and the more pedestrian characters like Harker, Seward, and Mina. The castle sets in the opening of the film are wonderfully constructed. With its dark shadows, long steps, cluttered spider webs, and state of disrepair, it’s the perfect gothic horror set. It’s an astonishingly gloomy film and while most of the London sets are somewhat pedestrian, there are also some very dreamlike forests, complete with a gorgeous layer of fog- an atmospheric and much cherished staple of black and white horror films. Odd choices like Armadillos and Opossums, who aren’t even native to Transylvania, instead of rats, end up being chilling and unsettling additions to the gothic castle. The first 20 minutes of Dracula are the most memorable and serve as some of the most atmospheric scenes, not only in Universal monster films, but in all of horror cinema. That’s not to discount the power of later scenes scattered throughout, such as the horror aboard the Vesta on its way to London during a storm, the woman in white, Dracula leading Mina through the forest, the climax of the film, or any scene featuring the crazed Renfield. Karl Freund’s lighting perfectly highlight’s both Lugosi’s and Frye’s Eyes, making them really stand out for dramatic effect. This lighting manages to make Dwight Frye look even more bug eyed and frightening than he would have been otherwise. The same can be said about Lugosi’s hypnotic stare, which is better achieved through this effect.

van hailsing with dracula
Unfortunately, like a stage production, some of acting is a bit stilted and there is virtually no camera movement, making much of the film rather static. Without the benefit of a musical score, much of the movie plods along at an uneven pace. In some scenes, it could have benefited from it, though I will admit that the quietness does add a level of creepiness in some of the more pivotal scenes. However, other films of the period work just fine without music so it’s more of a problem with the static camera, staging, and editing than it is with the long bits without sound. David Manners and Helen Chandler are a bit dull as the leads, Jonathan Harker and Mina Seward. While Chandler at least has the excuse of being under Dracula’s spell for much of the second half, Manners is just completely over the top and annoyingly wooden. There is a certain amount of sleepiness that comes along with both of their performances that keeps their characters from ever being completely compelling or altogether likable. Compare them to characters in one of James Whale’s horror films or even one of Browning’s more hands on productions and you’ll find a very glaring difference. Many of the London sets are also a bit bland, especially in comparison to the horrific gothic castle from the opening. The biggest problem with Dracula’s pacing is that it reaches its most visually interesting scenes in the very beginning and only occasionally captures that level of atmosphere again. Dracula is still a very bizarre and unconventional horror film, but I feel that some of it really could have been pushed a tad bit further. Under the helm of an enthusiastic James Whale, Universal’s next horror film, Frankenstein would completely steer away from Dracula’s mistakes and is much more even. At the end of the day though, Dracula is still a wonderful, classic film. It has its flaws, but both Lugosi and Dwight Frye are completely captivating. There are shades of brilliance that still manage to come through in this troubled production. More than just paving the way for the coming Universal classic monster films, John L Balderston would use it as a virtual stepping stone when writing The Mummy (1932), which really plays as a more refined and perfected version of Dracula in a lot of ways. All the more funny that that film was also the directorial debut of Dracula’s cinematographer, Karl Freund.

Bela

Dracula was a massive success for Universal and would become the first in a wave of films that turned them into the reigning house of horrors through the 1930’s, which consisted of such classics as Frankenstein, The Old Dark house, The mummy, The Invisible man, The black cat, The Raven, Werewolf of London, The Bride of Frankenstein, and Dracula’s daughter, before the genre went on a virtual hiatus in 1936 (coming back in 1939 with Son of Frankenstein, starting the second wave of Universal horror). Tod Browning would go to MGM, where he would direct his masterpiece, Freaks in 1932, along with Lugosi in another Dracula type role in Mark of the Vampire (1935), and the underrated The Devil Doll (1936), before fading into obscurity. It made a star out of Bela Lugosi, who would tragically face many downs for the remainder of his career with an addiction to Demerol and Methadone and a dive into Poverty Row trash films after his relationship with Universal Studios, MGM, and Columbia waned. Ironically, Lugosi’s last starring role for a major studio would be a return to the role of Dracula for the second time on film in Abbott and Costello meet Frankenstein (1948). After that, he would eventually plunge into exploitation films with Edward D Wood Jr before his death on August 16th, 1956. He was buried in his Dracula cape, going to the grave as the immortal character that the public most remembered him for. Along with his portrayal of the count, he lives on in the hearts of horror fans everywhere and his popularity and recognition today far eclipses even his A- list contemporaries.

dracula with the woman

In closing, while Dracula isn’t a perfect film, it’s still a great example of classic horror cinema. It’s an important piece of work that I highly recommend to anyone who considers themselves a true horror fan. While I don’t think it’s the cinematic achievement that Frankenstein or its sequel, The Bride of Frankenstein are, it’s still one that I cherish very much. Dracula and especially the actor, Bela Lugosi are very dear to me. In fact, while I type this, the theatrically poster hangs above me on the wall, with Lugosi’s commanding presence looming over me. Some of my earliest childhood memories are of those creepy moments in his films, where I would huddle by the television in the dark, transfixed by the glowing, otherworldly black and white images that reflected upon my seven year old face. Watching these old films is like peering into a window to the past, seeing a dream or fantasy filtered through the celluloid of a bygone age.  There are few cold, foggy nights where I don’t look up at the night sky and find myself reminded of Lugosi’s charm or  hear a noise coming from the dark without recalling Edward Van Sloan’s words from Dracula’s original ending – ““When you go home tonight, and the lights have been turned out, and you are afraid to look behind the curtains, and you dread to see a face appear at the window. why, just pull yourself together and remember that, after all. there are such things..!”

Goodnight.

castle dracula

-Lawrence S. Talbot

Lawrence Tolbert ron nelson

Grizzly -review by Lawrence S. Talbot

Screen Shot 2013-10-07 at 2.58.33 AM

I love the 70’s. The best thing about the decade for me is the exploitation movies.

Screen Shot 2013-10-07 at 2.58.55 AM

With guys like Roger Corman, Jack Hill, and William Girdler, some of the wildest moves ever made were produced during this period in  American cinema. There certainly has never been a decade that has been half as bold and daring as the 1970’s. That said, the success of Jaws inspired a legion of great and not so great killer animal film and along with Alfred Hitchcock’s the birds 15 years earlier, inspired a whole new genre. It’s a horror sub-genre that I am a complete sucker for, no matter how bad it is (Orca the killer whale, anyone?). In the wake of Spielberg’s killer shark movie, William Girdler’s Grizzly is one of the greatest examples of man vs. nature on film.

Screen Shot 2013-10-07 at 2.59.06 AM

The plot is simple. Have you see Jaws? Then you’ve seen Grizzly. It’s exactly like Jaws except on land. It’s all here. You have a Bear killing off campers, A park supervisor who refuses to close the park, and even main characters that are a bit similar to Sheriff Brody and Matt Hooper. It’s Jaws in the woods.

However, don’t let that stop you from seeing Grizzly. It’s sheer exploitation fun. Along with the original Piranha, it’s the best thing to be inspired by Jaws. The gore is plentiful enough and there are scenes that are incredibly zany. Top all of that off with a great performance by genre great Christopher George(City of the living dead, pieces, graduation day, Mortuary, the exterminator, day of the animals,) who adds a level of believability to the whole affair.

-Lawrence S. Talbot

73788_1503364300232_3329185_n

Tarantula reviewed by Lawrence S. Talbot

Directed by Jack Arnold

Screen Shot 2013-10-05 at 2.09.30 PM3 stabs

As time goes by and more films are reviewed, it’s going to become increasingly more obvious that I have a total love affair with classic horror and science fiction films from the 30’s to the early 60’s. When I was a child my father exposed me to a lot of them and I became absolutely obsessed with monsters because of it. As a result, these classics inspire a warm, familiar feeling inside of me that none of the modern horrors ever could. I’m determined to share my knowledge of them and to keep the memory of these near-forgotten classics alive for future generations. A lot of them require a further suspension of disbelief and less jaded viewership, but I think that for the most part, they’re all the better for it. There is an unmistakable charm to these films that could never be duplicated.

Screen Shot 2013-10-05 at 2.10.40 PM

It may seem a little quaint today with all of the horrors that we endure on a day to day basis, but in the 1950’s the public was petrified of nuclear fallout and the threat of annihilation at the height of the cold war (For a bit of perspective, I highly recommend Joe Dante’s wonderful film, Matinee). Of course, various studios were very quick to exploit this fear and like all times of great turmoil, wondrous film monsters were born. The first monster movie to fully take advantage of this was 1953’s The Beast from 20,000 fathoms. The classic Ray Harryhausen film would feature an ancient dinosaur being reawakened by nuclear testing and wreaking havoc on its old stomping grounds in modern day New York City. The success of this film would inspire the original Godzilla the following year and create the entire landscape of Kaiju cinema over in Japan. The next year, Warner bros would produce the first giant insect film, the 1954 Classic, THEM, which featured a colony of gargantuan flesh eating ants. THEM! Is a surprisingly effective and occasionally haunting film and serves as a total high water mark for the genre. Like most trendsetters, it inspired a legion of imitators and in 1955, Universal Studios, known for its beloved legacy of producing some of the greatest monsters ever created, continued the big bug craze with Tarantula.

Screen Shot 2013-10-05 at 2.12.00 PM

We begin in the desert where a grotesque, mutated man stomps down the hillside, suddenly collapses, and dies. Dr. Matt Hastings (Played by the always awesome, John Agar, the hero of many of Universal’s iconic sci fi pictures) a young, handsome, doctor and all around 50’s action hero, is summoned to take a look at the body and finds himself completely dumfounded by the man’s features. An autopsy is suggested as it is theorized  that the creature may Dr. Eric Jacobs(Played by stuntman, Eddie parker, who was most famous for portraying Klaris the Mummy in Abbott and Costello meet the mummy), who Hastings knew.  Driven to find answers, Dr. Hastings drives into the desert to speak with Professor Deemer (Leo G Carroll) at his lab and finds that he is experimenting with gigantism in an attempt to solve the growing problem of world hunger. In his lab we see a menagerie of horrors, from giant rats and rabbits to the titular giant Tarantula.

Deemer informs Hastings that Jacobs had been impatient and decided to try the formula on himself, resulting in a terrible case of Acromegaly. What Deemer fails to inform Hastings of is that Jacobs had also injected his assistant, Paul Lund with the deformity-inducing formula.

Screen Shot 2013-10-05 at 2.13.00 PM

Deemer soon begins to show symptoms of the drug, becoming hideously deformed and bed ridden. Meanwhile,   Human and animal bones are found scattered throughout the desert and it is soon discovered that the giant Tarantula, being well fed, has grown to town stomping proportions. Can the military (including a cameo from a young Clint Eastwood) stop this eight legged horror? Will Professor Deemer get a facelift?

Coming directly off of his success of his immortal classic, Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954) and its highly underrated Sequel, Revenge of the creature (1955), Jack Arnold does a fine job directing Tarantula. The cinematography and set design further expands upon his desert background work on  It came from Outer space(1953) as  further  advantage is taken of the desert landscape. The Joshua tree scattered desert would become a staple of monster movies for years to come and would eventually become almost exclusive to the lowest of budget affairs, including Ray Kellogg’s delightfully kitschy The Giant Gila Monster (1959).

Screen Shot 2013-10-05 at 2.14.16 PM

What truly separates Tarantula from other colossal arthropod films is that it’s one of the few that doesn’t deal with nuclear radiation in any form. Instead, the beast is unleashed by completely different means and another fear is exploited, that of the ever growing concern of world hunger. Also of interest is the inclusion of several human monsters, victims of the same serum that created our giant Arachnid friend.

Screen Shot 2013-10-05 at 2.15.40 PM

The makeup by Bud Westmore’s unit might come off as a bit silly to today’s jaded viewers, but at the time it was top of the line. The giant spider effects are serviceable and while not believable, have a certain charm to them. Some of them were achieved with puppets, which I absolutely adore, but the majority was done with a live spider and rear screen projection and overlapping. The majority of this is handled competently and never reaches the embarrassing levels of a Burt I Gordon production; Gordon being know for films such as the Beginning of the end, which featured live grasshoppers being filmed crawling on a picture of a building to achieve an effect.  While certainly dated, Tarantula is a few notches better than Gordon’s work, as well as many of its other contemporaries (films such as The monster from green Hell, earth vs. the spider, the giant claw).

What may keep Tarantula from being as great as some of the other classic science fiction films of the time is that it could be possibly be accused of lacking depth.  Many of the characterizations are a bit thin and you won’t find any of the haunting atmosphere of the quintessential atomic age horror, THEM. Nor will you find the political and social commentary of films like the Day the Earth stood Still (1951) or Gojira (1954). Also, without a leading lady like Creature from the black lagoon’s Julie Adams in her iconic white one piece, it could be seen as lacking the sexiness of some of the more well known B-movies of the time as well. However, anyone looking for such depth in a movie such as this is entirely missing the point. Tarantula is about having fun and enjoying the innocent thrill of watching a giant spider. At the end of the day, Tarantula is still a studio picture and its budget and direction keeps it from ever feeling completely laughable, especially when compared to some of the more hilarious flicks of the time(See It Conquered the World for example). It serves as one of the finer examples of the “giant bug” genre and is sure to please anyone who is a fan;  It’s never boring and more than delivers on its premise. I’d recommend seeing THEM! First as it’s truly a classic, but Tarantula is a good second feature to follow it up with. It lacks the suspense, mystery, and sense of dread of that famous ant picture and may be a bit closer to the typical Universal b-monster movie but what’s so wrong about that?  When it’s all said and done, that’s why we see films with titles like Tarantula and the Deadly Mantis. I would recommend checking out Jack Arnold’s other science fiction films of the period as well: Creature from the black lagoon, Revenge of the creature, Monster on the campus, It came from outer space,  and especially The Incredible shrinking man, which is one of the best and most profound science fiction films of the 50’s or another era.

   -Lawrence S. Talbot 

73788_1503364300232_3329185_n

Hell of the Living Dead review by Lawrence S. Talbot

Hell of the living dead(1980)

Screen Shot 2013-09-27 at 12.10.18 PM1 stab

Over the years, I’ve seen nearly one-hundred Italian horror films and one theory that I have about them is that the more alternate titles one has, the worse the movie is. Released under the titles Virus, Zombie creeping flesh, and Night of the zombies (and probably a zillion more), Hell of the living dead is a prime example of this rule. The film is directed by infamous knock off and exploitation filmmaker, Bruno Mattei and written by Claudio Fraggasso of Troll 2 fame. With these two schlockmeisters at the helm, Hell of the living dead could be considered so bad that it’s good.

Our journey through cheesiness begins with A team of scientists creating “operation sweet death”, a chemical created to solve the world’s population problem. In typical zombie movie fashion, the agent is released and the world becomes infested with the living dead. Later, swat team finds themselves on a top secret mission in Papua New Guinea where they encounter the titular flesh eaters, along with a group of vacationers. Together, they fight for survival and seek to find the cause of the infection.

I’ll begin with the part that everyone is here for-The gore. Luckily for gorehounds, it’s plentiful. However, those looking for realistic depictions of gory mayhem should look elsewhere as the effects are completely laughable. A charming staple of bad Italian horror films is that the filmmakers always seem to be so focused on their gory set pieces that they forget that the human body isn’t made out of silly putty. The zombies themselves are unimpressive though, mostly consisting of men in glistening, unset greasepaint and the few gory ones look like they’ve had their faces dunked in cherry pie. Another important element of  a good-bad movie is the acting. Here it’s completely madcap and perfectly compliments the zany  and utterly stupid characters, who spout a stream of constant one liners, courtesy of Fraggosso’s signature flair for laugh inducing dialog. Unfortunately, the score is composed of pieces stolen from Goblin’s scores for Dawn of the dead, Contamination, and Beyond the darkness. While these scores are fantastic, it’s really distracting if you’ve seen these movies. What keeps this movie from being the perfect laugh-fest is that it is bogged down by a constant use of stock footage, mostly from nature documentaries and mondo shock films. These scenes go on forever and stop the movie dead in it’s tracks, while not adding anything at all to the narrative. So, unless the idea of watching ten minutes of ancient burial rites and villagers eating maggots seems entertaining to you, I’d recommend keeping the fast forward button handy. Overall, I would recommend this movie as something to watch with a group of friends and a few beers. It’s one of my favorite bad movies.

-Lawrence Talbot         

73788_1503364300232_3329185_n

I walked with a zombie review by Lawrence S. Talbot

I walked with a zombie(1943)

Screen Shot 2013-09-27 at 12.04.17 PM5 stab

During the second World War, Hollywood became a well-oiled horror machine, producing an ever-expanding heap of horror movies to meet with the growing demands of the public, who sought refuge from the real life horrors of the war. None of these studios was  more successful at creating genuinely frightening and intelligent horror movies as RKO’s B- picture unit, and no other picture was as thoughtful, haunting, and poetic  as 1943’s I Walked with a Zombie.

The story concerns Betsy Connell (Frances Dee), a nurse who travels to the mysterious Caribbean island of Saint Sebastian to care for plantation owner Paul Holland’s (Tom Conway) catatonic wife. Falling in love with Holland, she promises to bring his wife back to him and soon discovers the island’s superstitious Voodoo roots.

Taking its title from a sensational story appearing in American weekly magazine, Producer Val Lewton aimed to elevate the film beyond its lurid source material and instead  drew inspiration from Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre and Daphne Du Maurier’s Rebecca. Together with director Jacques Tourneur and screenwriters Curt Siodmak and Ardell Wray, he fashioned his masterpiece. What makes I Walked with a Zombie so memorable is how rich it is with atmosphere. Cinematographer J. Roy Hunt saturates the film with stylistic dark shadows that could easily compete with the best film noir of the time. The score, by Roy Webb, is filled with lovely melodies and lullabies that are graceful yet minimal; the soundtrack relying  more on the mournful sounds of  the wind, voodoo drums, and  silence, to establish mood rather than a  bombastic horror score. Filmed on sets borrowed from RKO’s  A-pictures and bathed in stunning gloom, it creates a dreamlike and romanticized vision of the West Indies that is completely mesmerizing. The film’s horror comes solely from suggestion and atmosphere, creating a true sense of psychological dread without even a hint of onscreen violence.  Before the sensationalism of today’s gut munching undead, I Walked with a Zombie shows just enough to imply more and asks us to take a chilling look into the dark and into our own hearts.

 -Lawrence S. Talbot                       

73788_1503364300232_3329185_n

Tombs of the blind dead review by Lawrence S. Talbot

Tombs of the blind dead 

Screen Shot 2013-09-27 at 11.46.55 AM4 stabs

In 1972, Armando De Ossorio directed the first of four films in his delightfully creepy blind dead series. The resurrected Templet Knights might be the scariest zombies ever created and this film may be one of the most influential horror films of the 1970’s.

In a European castle in the middle of nowhere, the Templars, a fictionalized version of the real Templar Knights, are resurrected when the sun sets. Being horrible sadists in life, the Templars were burned at the stake and their eyes were eaten out by crows, resulting in their blindness. Nightly, they return from the grave as shrouded skeletal figures and feed on the blood of the living. Thought they cannot see, they locate their victims by sound.

An unfortunate woman decides to spend the night in the ruins and is feasted upon by the ghouls. Eventually, her friends venture  to the castle hoping to find her and end up having to fend off the relentless undead Templars.

Though the pacing of the film is a bit slow and it’s very short on plot, Tombs of the blind dead more than delivers when it comes to mood and creepiness. It’s also one of the first european horror films to combine graphic violence with sex, becoming a true exploitation classic. What makes the movie so memorable are the Templars themselves, the magnificent and eerie locations, and the haunting musical score.

The Templars aren’t nearly greasepaint smeared ghouls like most undead in films at the time. They are completely skeletal and shrouded in hoods and rotting medieval garb. Coming in droves, like an army, they slowly shamble along, reaching out their skeletal arms and relentlessly listen for their victims. They are inescapable and unstoppable, and in their reaper-like are hoods are like death itself literally creeping up. One can run for so long, but the undead fiends will eventually get you. To up the ante, the Templars ride on undead horses and carry swords in pursuit of their victims. More than just mindless flesh eaters, they are sadistic in nature and occasionally add sexual torture to the mix. As a result, the Templars are some of the most nightmarish and memorable creatures in the annals of horror. I honestly can’t say enough about them.

The movie was filmed in a crumbling Spanish castle which serve as possibly the most sinister, creepy sets ever put to film, being further augmented by a chilling score composed mostly of chants. The film contains a high level of eerie atmosphere, making Tombs of the blind dead is an unforgettable film experience.

It was followed by three sequels: Return of the evil dead, The ghost Galleon, and Night of the sequels. I would highly recommend the second one as well.

 -Lawrence S. Talbot 

73788_1503364300232_3329185_n

Zombie 2 review by Lawrence S. Talbot

          Zombi 2 

Screen Shot 2013-09-27 at 11.36.02 AM2 stabs

1978 saw the release of the quintessential zombie film, George Romero’s Dawn of the dead. Italian horror maestro Dario Argento served as producer and was given license to create his own cut  of the film in Europe.  It was retitled “Zombi” in Italy and was a massive success. One of the popular trends in Italian filmmaking at the time was churning out often inferior cash-ins or fake sequels to hit films, with the release of “dawn” almost single handedly inspiring the Italian zombie genre and virtually replacing their notorious cannibal movies in the realm of gut munching cinema. An unofficial sequel, Zombi 2 was quickly put into production. Directed by famed director, Lucio Fulci, who had been responsible for some of the great giallo mystery films(Don’t torture a duckling and Lizard in a woman’s skin), directs the film with more integrity than is usually found in these exploitative titles and fashioned what most consider to be his masterpiece. It was released in the United States simply under the title of “Zombie” and became notorious in the U.K as “Zombie flesh eaters”, where it was quickly banned. It is perhaps the greatest of all of the Italian gore epics.

An abandoned ship washes into New York Harbor, where it is investigated by two harbor patrol officers.  Suddenly, a hulking zombie attacks them, ripping the throat out of one officer and being fired upon by the other.

The boat is revealed to belong to the father of  a young woman, Anne Bowles(Tisa Farrow). However, all that she knows about her father had left for the Island of Matool in the Caribbean and that she had not heard from him since. Meanwhile, reporter Peter West(Ian McCulloch) is sent to investigate. The two meet and decide to venture  to Matool to find her father. What follows is a Journey to an island of voodoo superstition and swarms of walking corpses with an appetite for human flesh.

Despite it’s exploitative beginnings, Zombi 2 may be my favorite zombie film. Gianetto De Rossi’s effects far surpass Savini’s work in Dawn of the dead and are genuinely unsettling, especially when you come to the film’s most famous set piece, the infamous “splinter in the eye” sequence. Fulci loads the film with atmosphere, transforming the island of Matool into a dreamlike, nightmare world of fog with a constant tinge of grime that permeates nearly every scene. This makes the film’s gory offerings all the more grotesque, visceral, and dirty. One can almost feel the tropical heat of the island upon viewing the film. The cinematography is downright brilliant and establishes a true sense of dread, despite the characters themselves being virtually paper thin and annoying at times. At times, Fulci’s work recalls the best Spaghetti westerns in style, fully taking advantage of it’s wide screen format, while also being perfectly suited for tighter shots which create a feeling of total claustrophobia. At the end of the day, Zombi 2 is a fine zombie film and one that I would consider essential viewing for anyone who is in love with the genre.

 -Lawrence S. Talbot         

73788_1503364300232_3329185_n

The Living Dead at Manchester Morgue review by Lawrence S. Talbot

The living dead at Manchester morgue.

Review by Lawrence S. Talbot

Screen Shot 2013-09-27 at 11.27.38 AM 3 stabs

Being released under over 15 different titles internationally, The living dead at Manchester morgue (A.K.A: Let sleeping corpses like, Don’t open the window) is often mistakingly considered to be a British film. Actually, it’s a Spanish/Italian production from Spanish filmmaker, Jorge Grau. However, for better or worse, It and films of it’s kind were responsible for bringing  horror out of the Victorian era and away from the classic gothic set pieces that were formerly popular, thus  changing the face of the genre forever. This film is perhaps the best zombie movie to be released in the genre’s humble beginnings between Night of the living dead and Dawn of the dead.

George (Ray Lovelock), a motorcyclist very much of the “Easy Rider” mold, is on his way to an antique shop when his motorcycle is accidentally damaged by a girl named Edna (Cristina Galbó of “what have they done to Solange?” fame) at a local gas station. After demanding a lift to his destination, the two find themselves at a dead end beside a river. While stopping for directions, they witness a large machine in the field and upon inquiring about it’s use, they discover that the machine is used to destroy insects by blasting sonic radiation waves  into the ground.  Edna is soon attacked by a shambling man by the river and it’s eventually revealed that the radiation has brought the dead back to life. The ghouls unintentionally frame the couple for murder and while dodging attacks from the creatures, they are also on the run from a cop who wants to take them in.

The living Dead at Manchester Morgue may be responsible for setting the Italian zombie genre into motion. It might have been Dawn of the Dead’s influence that would later inspire a rash of imitators, but this earlier effort tends to get overlooked. Filled with gruesome gore and chilling set pieces,  the film begins as a slow build but becomes something of unrelenting shock. It’s visually interesting with it’s depiction of the living dead shambling along the British countryside, through crumbling cemeteries, and eventually laying waste to a hospital. Jorge Grau’s direction is first rate and loaded with atmosphere, further enhanced by lurid colors and the occasional gothic trappings. Living dead at Manchester morgue is a classic Zombie film that is filled with tension and a constant sense of dread. Though the gore might be tame by today’s standards, at the time it was unparalleled by anything else.  However, the atmosphere more than makes up for it and the characters are actually worth caring about.  The Film has since become a cult classic and it’s reputation is well earned as It manages to be both scary and incredibly well made. In the end, this is one of the more imaginative horror films of it’s era and one that shouldn’t be overlooked.

-Lawrence S. Talbot                 

73788_1503364300232_3329185_n